Breaking: Federal Court Rules That Criticism Of Islam Will Be Punished – What’s Your Response?

0
697

As World Net Daily reported, the New Jersey township which a group of Muslims filed a lawsuit against for declining to accept a huge mosque project is now getting back in court. The reason is a settlement agreement which prohibits people from commenting on “Islam” or “Muslims.”

 It is crucial to mention that an important tenet of Shariah prohibits negative comments in any form regarding the religion. According to the Thomas More Law Center who filed a lawsuit against the township in the name of the residents whose house is within 200 feet of the proposed mosque, the settlement “reads more like an instrument of surrender.”

The court ruled in favor of the Islamic Society of Basking Ridge following the refusion of the mosque project due to traffic and other concerns. The Township agreed to cover $3.5 million and a “public hearing to approve the settlement.”

Residents Christopher and Loretta Quict decided to challenge this agreement, saying that it actually limits the freedom of speech and breaks the Establishment Clause.

“The Quicks reside within 200 feet of the proposed mosque construction in a zoned residential area,” Thomas More explained. “Yet, the settlement agreement prohibits them from describing the many unique features of Islamic worship which will impact the design of the building, traffic density, water and sewage, traffic control problems, road construction, and parking arrangements.

According to the settlement agreement, ISBR is permitted to make statements concerning Christians and Jews and their places of worship, but in contrast, the agreement prohibits commentary relating to Islam or Muslims. In fact, ISBR has previously discussed the Christian and Jewish religions and their places of worship.”

Richard Thompson, chief counsel for Thomas More, said the Islamic center “has taken the extraordinary step of concealing significant links on their website to a radical group named by the federal government as an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorism financing trial in America history, the Islamic Society of North America (‘ISNA’).”

Thompson said that while “claiming that the township had a religious animus against Muslims, ISBR hid from the public view its animus toward Christians and Jews, by not only hiding anti-Christian and anti-Semitic verses published on its website but also hiding its significant ties to ISNA.

Instead of standing up to defend its citizens against ISBR’s hate-filled anti-Semitic and anti-Christian bias, the township colluded with ISBR’s ‘Civilization Jihad’ by capitulating to payment of millions of dollars to ISBR, allowing the construction of the new mosque and Islamic center in violation

“ISBR is setting a dangerous unconstitutional precedent by abusing a court process to chill and trample on the First Amendment rights of private citizens whose only involvement was to speak out against the mosque at public hearings,” Thompson said earlier this year.

He asked for the subpoenas to be thrown out “because the U.S. Supreme Court has held that speech at a public place on a matter of public concern is entitled to special protection.”

WE WOULD BE HAPPY TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS AND PREDICTIONS

SHARE